FROM : Gary L. Wade
DATE : Thu Jul 03 20:17:25 2008
Apparently you haven't perused the XML used by Carbon NIBs. There's lots of linkages across the format so that any particular object is not as completely self-contained as you believe.
>
>On 3 jul 2008, at 14.54, Kyle Sluder wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Tommy Nordgren <tommy.<email_removed>
>> > wrote:
>>> So it is a matter of writing and applying a suitable xsl stylesheet
>>> file.
>>
>> The transformations required to obtain a meaningful Cocoa XIB from a
>> Carbon NIB are impossible to express in XSL. Or any language for that
>> matter. It requires human thought, because Carbon NIBs and Cocoa XIBs
>> do not express the same concept. Even if you could transform a
>> particular Carbon NIB to a Cocoa XIB (certainly a challenge,
>> considering the spec is not documented and warned to be very fragile)
>> it would be a very bad idea to do so, particularly because they would
>> not be semantically equivalent.
>>
>> --Kyle Sluder
> Not correct. Of course connections can't be created this way, but it
>is certainly possible
>to replace carbon objects with the equivalent Cocoa objects.
> Niltargeted actions for the standard menu items can also be set up
>this way.
>----------------------------------
>Skinheads are so tired of immigration, that they are going to move to
>a country that don't accept immigrants!
>Tommy Nordgren
>tommy.<email_removed>
>
>
>
DATE : Thu Jul 03 20:17:25 2008
Apparently you haven't perused the XML used by Carbon NIBs. There's lots of linkages across the format so that any particular object is not as completely self-contained as you believe.
>
>On 3 jul 2008, at 14.54, Kyle Sluder wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Tommy Nordgren <tommy.<email_removed>
>> > wrote:
>>> So it is a matter of writing and applying a suitable xsl stylesheet
>>> file.
>>
>> The transformations required to obtain a meaningful Cocoa XIB from a
>> Carbon NIB are impossible to express in XSL. Or any language for that
>> matter. It requires human thought, because Carbon NIBs and Cocoa XIBs
>> do not express the same concept. Even if you could transform a
>> particular Carbon NIB to a Cocoa XIB (certainly a challenge,
>> considering the spec is not documented and warned to be very fragile)
>> it would be a very bad idea to do so, particularly because they would
>> not be semantically equivalent.
>>
>> --Kyle Sluder
> Not correct. Of course connections can't be created this way, but it
>is certainly possible
>to replace carbon objects with the equivalent Cocoa objects.
> Niltargeted actions for the standard menu items can also be set up
>this way.
>----------------------------------
>Skinheads are so tired of immigration, that they are going to move to
>a country that don't accept immigrants!
>Tommy Nordgren
>tommy.<email_removed>
>
>
>
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Fosse | Jun 29, 10:59 | |
| Christopher Pavici… | Jun 29, 21:37 | |
| Fosse | Jul 3, 05:31 | |
| Steve Christensen | Jul 3, 06:47 | |
| Jean-Daniel Dupas | Jul 3, 09:44 | |
| Tommy Nordgren | Jul 3, 14:27 | |
| Kyle Sluder | Jul 3, 14:54 | |
| Tommy Nordgren | Jul 3, 15:47 | |
| Gary L. Wade | Jul 3, 20:17 |






Cocoa mail archive

