FROM : mmalc crawford
DATE : Wed Jul 02 23:04:55 2008
On Jul 2, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Alex Wait wrote:
> if you have the @property statement, and you use the I think
> @synthesize
> (could be wrong about that) you don't need to write the functions
> yourself.
>
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/Articles/chapter_5_section_3.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30001163-CH17-SW9
> ("Property Implementation Directives").
Then see also:
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/Articles/chapter_5_section_3.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30001163-CH17-SW10
> ("Core Foundation").
> Try taking out the @property statement.
>
This just doesn't make sense.
(a) Properties are orthogonal to KVC:
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/Articles/chapter_5_section_5.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30001163-CH17-SW6
>.
(b) Declaring properties is considered to be best practice precisely
because they make the semantics of access clear -- there's no reason
at all to remove the declaration.
Chris and Nathan have addressed the original question.
mmalc
DATE : Wed Jul 02 23:04:55 2008
On Jul 2, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Alex Wait wrote:
> if you have the @property statement, and you use the I think
> @synthesize
> (could be wrong about that) you don't need to write the functions
> yourself.
>
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/Articles/chapter_5_section_3.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30001163-CH17-SW9
> ("Property Implementation Directives").
Then see also:
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/Articles/chapter_5_section_3.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30001163-CH17-SW10
> ("Core Foundation").
> Try taking out the @property statement.
>
This just doesn't make sense.
(a) Properties are orthogonal to KVC:
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/Articles/chapter_5_section_5.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30001163-CH17-SW6
>.
(b) Declaring properties is considered to be best practice precisely
because they make the semantics of access clear -- there's no reason
at all to remove the declaration.
Chris and Nathan have addressed the original question.
mmalc
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Milen Dzhumerov | Jul 2, 19:13 | |
| Alex Wait | Jul 2, 21:26 | |
| Nathan Vander Wilt | Jul 2, 22:33 | |
| Chris Suter | Jul 2, 22:34 | |
| mmalc crawford | Jul 2, 23:04 |






Cocoa mail archive

