FROM : Kyle Sluder
DATE : Mon Jun 30 21:55:36 2008
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Steve Byan <<email_removed>> wrote:
> That's a bummer, because RFC822 dates have some optional elements and so
> don't conform to a fixed format. I hoped that the default parsing was smart.
Well it looks like the RFC822 date grammar is context-free so
implementing a parser shouldn't be that hard. You'll have to deal
with Y2K, though.
--Kyle Sluder
DATE : Mon Jun 30 21:55:36 2008
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Steve Byan <<email_removed>> wrote:
> That's a bummer, because RFC822 dates have some optional elements and so
> don't conform to a fixed format. I hoped that the default parsing was smart.
Well it looks like the RFC822 date grammar is context-free so
implementing a parser shouldn't be that hard. You'll have to deal
with Y2K, though.
--Kyle Sluder
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Steve Byan | Jun 30, 20:35 | |
| Andy Lee | Jun 30, 20:50 | |
| Nick Zitzmann | Jun 30, 20:54 | |
| Steve Byan | Jun 30, 21:14 | |
| Kyle Sluder | Jun 30, 21:55 |






Cocoa mail archive

