Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership
FROM : mmalc Crawford
DATE : Thu May 08 01:34:25 2008

On May 7, 2008, at 2:47 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:

> No. The rule is that only methods containing "create", "copy", and 
> "alloc" in their name implicitly retain.
>

No, this is wrong.
This is why people are typically discouraged from repeating memory 
management rules on lists and instead encouraged to point developers 
to the simple straightforward rules given in the documentation -- as 
illustrated by Joar's reply.

mmalc

Related mailsAuthorDate
mlUnderstanding reference count ownership Gregory Seidman May 7, 23:32
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Christiaan Hofman May 7, 23:47
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership j o a r May 7, 23:47
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Jim Correia May 7, 23:49
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership mmalc Crawford May 8, 01:34
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Paul Sargent May 8, 15:16
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Christiaan Hofman May 8, 15:32
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership mmalc Crawford May 8, 16:55
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Christiaan Hofman May 8, 17:16
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership j o a r May 8, 17:30
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Sherm Pendley May 8, 17:50
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Christiaan Hofman May 8, 18:09
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Sherm Pendley May 8, 18:28
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Christiaan Hofman May 8, 18:48
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Sherm Pendley May 8, 19:16
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Christiaan Hofman May 10, 17:20
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Sherm Pendley May 10, 19:58
mlRe: Understanding reference count ownership Clark Cox May 10, 20:36