Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help...
FROM : Uli Kusterer
DATE : Wed May 21 22:45:20 2008

Am 21.05.2008 um 18:47 schrieb Peter Hudson:
> Any initialiser  with a  "+"  in front of it returns an autoreleased 
> object



  NO! Several mistakes in this sentence:

1) "+" simply means that it is a method of the class, not of 
individual instances. It has NOTHING to do with whether the result is 
autoreleased, a shared singleton, or needs to be released by the caller.

2) An initializer is an "initXXX" method. By definition, you first 
request the memory for your object (using +alloc), then you have an 
instance, which you initialize by calling an initXXX method on it. 
Thus, initializers are inherently instance methods (with a "-"), and 
never have a "+" in front of them.

3) The Cocoa convention for deciding whether you, as the caller, 
should release an object depends on the name of the method. See 
Apple's docs for the details, as the list ops don't like people 
rephrasing the memory management rules (because usually people forget 
one or another rule).

Cheers,
-- Uli Kusterer
"The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere..."
http://www.zathras.de

Related mailsAuthorDate
mlTrying to understand -- please help... john darnell May 21, 18:05
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Torsten Curdt May 21, 18:13
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Vijay Malhan May 21, 18:16
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Paul Bailey May 21, 18:20
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Hank Heijink (Mail… May 21, 18:28
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... João Pavão May 21, 18:29
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Gérard Iglesias May 21, 18:34
mlRE: Trying to understand -- please help... john darnell May 21, 18:41
mlTrying to understand -- please help... Peter Hudson May 21, 18:47
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Gérard Iglesias May 21, 18:49
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Clark Cox May 21, 19:03
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Gérard Iglesias May 21, 19:11
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Shawn Erickson May 21, 19:17
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Bill Bumgarner May 21, 19:21
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Hank Heijink (Mail… May 21, 19:25
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Shawn Erickson May 21, 19:32
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Sherm Pendley May 21, 19:36
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Shawn Erickson May 21, 19:38
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Ilan Volow May 21, 19:40
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... I. Savant May 21, 20:05
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... I. Savant May 21, 20:07
mlTrying to understand -- please help... Johnny Lundy May 21, 20:35
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Shawn Erickson May 21, 20:45
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Vijay Malhan May 21, 20:47
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Bill Bumgarner May 21, 20:48
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Shawn Erickson May 21, 20:54
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... I. Savant May 21, 20:57
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Shawn Erickson May 21, 21:00
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... I. Savant May 21, 21:00
ml+initialize (was Re: Trying to understand -- please help...) Jason Stephenson May 21, 21:00
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Michael Vannorsdel May 21, 21:07
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Ilan Volow May 21, 21:08
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Vijay Malhan May 21, 21:14
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Shawn Erickson May 21, 21:24
mlTrying to understand -- please help... Johnny Lundy May 21, 21:37
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Andy Lee May 21, 21:41
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Jeff LaMarche May 21, 21:58
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Sherm Pendley May 21, 22:07
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Sherm Pendley May 21, 22:20
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Uli Kusterer May 21, 22:33
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Sherm Pendley May 21, 22:37
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Uli Kusterer May 21, 22:45
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Sherm Pendley May 21, 22:52
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Christopher Nebel May 21, 23:06
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Hamish Allan May 21, 23:09
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Sherm Pendley May 21, 23:15
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Ken Thomases May 21, 23:28
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Sherm Pendley May 21, 23:29
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Andy Lee May 22, 01:18
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Jens Alfke May 22, 04:23
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Jens Alfke May 22, 04:30
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Jens Alfke May 22, 04:37
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Michael Vannorsdel May 22, 04:55
mlRE: Trying to understand -- please help... Caleb Strockbine May 22, 16:27
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Greg Titus May 22, 17:43
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... glenn andreas May 22, 18:25
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Andy Lee May 22, 22:08
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Andy Lee May 22, 22:15
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Joseph Kelly May 22, 22:16
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Johnny Lundy May 22, 23:13
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... glenn andreas May 22, 23:42
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Sherm Pendley May 22, 23:59
mlRe: Trying to understand -- please help... Andy Lee May 23, 00:02