FROM : mmalc Crawford
DATE : Sun May 18 16:25:04 2008
On May 18, 2008, at 3:20 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
> I know it has been said. But I have never heard an alternative to
> forcing a KVO change notification. Given that dependent keys can
> only be set for the same object... And if you would think there may
> be an alternative in this particular situation (though I don't see
> it), I am talking about the general situation. Please proof me
> wrong, but I couldn't find it.
>
This is simply asinine.
There's nothing to prove wrong. As Clark suggested, the solution is
to get the design right.
mmalc
DATE : Sun May 18 16:25:04 2008
On May 18, 2008, at 3:20 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
> I know it has been said. But I have never heard an alternative to
> forcing a KVO change notification. Given that dependent keys can
> only be set for the same object... And if you would think there may
> be an alternative in this particular situation (though I don't see
> it), I am talking about the general situation. Please proof me
> wrong, but I couldn't find it.
>
This is simply asinine.
There's nothing to prove wrong. As Clark suggested, the solution is
to get the design right.
mmalc






Cocoa mail archive

