FROM : Hamish Allan
DATE : Sun May 11 16:36:09 2008
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 2:04 PM, I. Savant <<email_removed>> wrote:
> Not everything is observable because not everything is compliant. There are
> a number of reasons why it might not be feasible or why it might be woefully
> inefficient to use KVO.
>
> I take it, Chris, you really like the KVO mechanism. I do to. ;-) But you
> can't fit everything into it, nor should you where performance is more
> important than programmer convenience.
Is there any reason why this should be particularly less efficient
than NSManagedObjectContextObjectsDidChangeNotification?
Hamish
DATE : Sun May 11 16:36:09 2008
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 2:04 PM, I. Savant <<email_removed>> wrote:
> Not everything is observable because not everything is compliant. There are
> a number of reasons why it might not be feasible or why it might be woefully
> inefficient to use KVO.
>
> I take it, Chris, you really like the KVO mechanism. I do to. ;-) But you
> can't fit everything into it, nor should you where performance is more
> important than programmer convenience.
Is there any reason why this should be particularly less efficient
than NSManagedObjectContextObjectsDidChangeNotification?
Hamish
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Keary Suska | May 10, 20:46 | |
| I. Savant | May 10, 20:54 | |
| Dave Fernandes | May 10, 21:03 | |
| Chris Hanson | May 11, 03:54 | |
| Dave Fernandes | May 11, 07:40 | |
| I. Savant | May 11, 15:04 | |
| Hamish Allan | May 11, 16:36 | |
| Keary Suska | May 11, 17:33 |






Cocoa mail archive

