Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: Should a Method set NSError* to nil when No Error?
FROM : Clark Cox
DATE : Sun Apr 20 17:40:53 2008

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Uli Kusterer
<witness.of.<email_removed>> wrote:
> Am 20.04.2008 um 11:45 schrieb Jean-Daniel Dupas:
>
>
> > I greatly prefere the C99 way to do it. It prevents variables conflict if
> you have more than one loop in your method.
> >
> > for (int idx = 0; idx < maxCount(); idx++) {
> >
> > }
> >
>
>
>  Yeah, I like that, when I can use it. It's just not always possible, and
> sometimes you want several loops to share a counter.
>
>  Besides, it wouldn't have illustrated the point I was trying to make, that
> I always initialize variables, even if I'll be smashing their value right
> thereafter. Maybe I should have gone with:
>
>        BOOL    success = NO;
>
>        success = [[NSFileManager defaultManager]
> changeCurrentDirectoryPath: @"/"];
>
>  or whatever.


In such a case, I don't declare the variable until I actually need it:

BOOL success = [[NSFileManager defaultManager]
changeCurrentDirectoryPath: @"/"];

That way, there is zero chance of it being uninitialized at any point
before use, as it doesn't exist before its first use.



--
Clark S. Cox III
<email_removed>

Related mailsAuthorDate
mlShould a Method set NSError* to nil when No Error? Jerry Krinock Apr 19, 18:46
mlRe: Should a Method set NSError* to nil when No Error? Bill Bumgarner Apr 19, 20:24
mlRe: Should a Method set NSError* to nil when No Error? Jerry Krinock Apr 19, 22:10
mlRe: Should a Method set NSError* to nil when No Error? Ali Ozer Apr 20, 00:11
mlRe: Should a Method set NSError* to nil when No Error? Uli Kusterer Apr 20, 01:03
mlRe: Should a Method set NSError* to nil when No Error? Jean-Daniel Dupas Apr 20, 11:45
mlRe: Should a Method set NSError* to nil when No Error? Uli Kusterer Apr 20, 16:20
mlRe: Should a Method set NSError* to nil when No Error? Clark Cox Apr 20, 17:40