FROM : Scott Anguish
DATE : Thu Mar 06 21:55:16 2008
Official information is forthcoming.
On Mar 6, 2008, at 12:31 PM, I. Savant wrote:
>> I was just wondering what the policy will be when it comes to Cocoa
>> vs
>> Cocoa-touch questions. Obviously they are related, obviously this
>> will
>> lead to a huge increase in traffic (not necessarily bad). Assuming
>> that there would be a separate Cocoa-touch/iphone-dev mailinglist
>> (don't know?) it would be cool if cocoabuilder.com could still
>> aggregate them like it does with the omni vs cocoa-dev list...
>
> While I understand from mmalc's response that the SDK is under NDA,
> I'd like to add my vote for a separate mailing list if/when the NDA is
> lifted. Anything specific to the iPhone / Cocoa-Touch (horrible name,
> by the way) should go to that list. More general Cocoa topics could be
> covered in either list.
DATE : Thu Mar 06 21:55:16 2008
Official information is forthcoming.
On Mar 6, 2008, at 12:31 PM, I. Savant wrote:
>> I was just wondering what the policy will be when it comes to Cocoa
>> vs
>> Cocoa-touch questions. Obviously they are related, obviously this
>> will
>> lead to a huge increase in traffic (not necessarily bad). Assuming
>> that there would be a separate Cocoa-touch/iphone-dev mailinglist
>> (don't know?) it would be cool if cocoabuilder.com could still
>> aggregate them like it does with the omni vs cocoa-dev list...
>
> While I understand from mmalc's response that the SDK is under NDA,
> I'd like to add my vote for a separate mailing list if/when the NDA is
> lifted. Anything specific to the iPhone / Cocoa-Touch (horrible name,
> by the way) should go to that list. More general Cocoa topics could be
> covered in either list.
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Griekspo… | Mar 6, 21:23 | |
| mmalc crawford | Mar 6, 21:28 | |
| Alexander Griekspo… | Mar 6, 21:30 | |
| I. Savant | Mar 6, 21:31 | |
| Scott Anguish | Mar 6, 21:55 |






Cocoa mail archive

