FROM : Keith Duncan
DATE : Wed Mar 12 23:33:57 2008
> There's no reason why it can't be named "create..." and return a
> retained object,
My personal preference is to use Create... for naming functions which
return alloc/malloc memory, inline with the CoreFoundation memory
management rules. I tend to use -(id)new... for methods, again for the
same reason.
This ensures that your functions and methods follow the established
API grammar and increases readability.
Keith
DATE : Wed Mar 12 23:33:57 2008
> There's no reason why it can't be named "create..." and return a
> retained object,
My personal preference is to use Create... for naming functions which
return alloc/malloc memory, inline with the CoreFoundation memory
management rules. I tend to use -(id)new... for methods, again for the
same reason.
This ensures that your functions and methods follow the established
API grammar and increases readability.
Keith






Cocoa mail archive

