Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful
FROM : Michael Tsai
DATE : Wed Feb 06 16:12:43 2008

On Feb 6, 2008, at 4:39 AM, John Engelhart wrote:

> Read the above, "object" is synonymous for "struct".  The "layout" 
> of an object is identical to the "layout" of a struct.



That is true but irrelevant. What matters for garbage collection is 
whether the variables are typed as objects at compile time, because 
that's what determines what code the compiler emits for assignments.

> - (const char *)UTF8String;    // Convenience to return null-
> terminated UTF8 representation
>
> Since the pointer that UTF8String returns is provably from 
> NSAllocateCollectable, this prototype has /DISCARDED/ the type 
> qualifier of __strong.


The API does not promise that -UTF8String returns a collectable 
pointer. The current implementation may do so, but the documentation 
says that you should copy the C string if you want to store it.

--Michael

Related mailsAuthorDate
mlUse of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful John Engelhart Feb 4, 02:57
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Quincey Morris Feb 4, 05:09
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful j o a r Feb 4, 08:18
mlre: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Ben Trumbull Feb 4, 10:19
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Alastair Houghton Feb 4, 14:11
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Greg Titus Feb 4, 16:39
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Sean McBride Feb 4, 22:40
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful John Engelhart Feb 5, 01:14
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Chris Hanson Feb 5, 02:21
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Jonathon Mah Feb 5, 08:47
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Alastair Houghton Feb 5, 13:40
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful John Engelhart Feb 6, 10:39
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Alastair Houghton Feb 6, 12:15
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful John Engelhart Feb 6, 15:59
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Michael Tsai Feb 6, 16:12
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful glenn andreas Feb 6, 16:45
mlBug in CF/NSString's no-copy constructors (was Re: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful) Alastair Houghton Feb 6, 16:55
mlRe: Bug in CF/NSString's no-copy constructors (was Re: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful) Michael Tsai Feb 6, 17:46
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Clark Cox Feb 6, 17:47
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Jean-Daniel Dupas Feb 6, 18:05
mlRe: Bug in CF/NSString's no-copy constructors Alastair Houghton Feb 6, 18:46
ml[Moderator] Re: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Scott Anguish Feb 6, 18:46
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Hamish Allan Feb 6, 18:52
mlRe: Bug in CF/NSString's no-copy constructors Michael Tsai Feb 6, 19:29
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Hamish Allan Feb 6, 19:36
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Alastair Houghton Feb 6, 20:12
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful glenn andreas Feb 6, 21:23
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Sean McBride Feb 6, 21:47
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Michael Ash Feb 6, 22:38
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Hamish Allan Feb 6, 23:49
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful John Engelhart Feb 7, 02:06
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Hamish Allan Feb 7, 02:40
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Chris Suter Feb 7, 02:48
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful John Engelhart Feb 7, 02:48
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Clark Cox Feb 7, 03:52
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful glenn andreas Feb 7, 04:01
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Timothy Reaves Feb 7, 04:08
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Brady Duga Feb 7, 04:22
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful John Engelhart Feb 7, 07:14
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful John Engelhart Feb 7, 07:14
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Michael Ash Feb 7, 23:58
mlRe: Bug in CF/NSString's no-copy constructors John Engelhart Feb 8, 03:31
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful John Engelhart Feb 8, 05:23
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Greg Parker Feb 8, 05:30
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Michael Tsai Feb 8, 05:56
mlRe: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Hamish Allan Feb 8, 18:35
ml[Moderator] Re: Use of Mac OS X 10.5 / Leopards Garbage Collection Considered Harmful Scott Anguish Feb 8, 22:17