FROM : Nicko van Someren
DATE : Sun Feb 03 04:22:52 2008
On 2 Feb 2008, at 21:31, Scott Anguish wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Wesley Smith wrote:
>
>> On Feb 2, 2008 1:15 PM, Scott Anguish <<email_removed>> wrote:
>>> Do not post links to reverse engineered APIs here.
>>>
>> why not?
>
> First, the Mac OS X Software License Agreement says you may not
> disassembly or reverse-engineer (This is list not the place to
> debate whether or not this would fall under fair use or not)
Humph... OS X sends me an event on a post card (OK, in an NSEvent),
one it sends to everyone else who has a MacBook Air, and I'm not
allowed to tell people what it says? I agree that this isn't the
place to debate what is and isn't reverse engineering, but the simple
fact is that this isn't.
> Second, the discussion of private API is not appropriate to this
> list. That includes pointing to other resources. This has been the
> policy for a long time now.
That's news. They've been discussed on this list sporadically for a
long time, and this policy is news to me...
> Finally, if you have issues with these policies, the list is not the
> place to discuss or debate them. Contact the admin address in the
> signature.
This list is, however, the place to discuss APIs that are of use and
interest to Cocoa programmers, is it not? Can you suggest a single
other forum in which this information would be more useful or well
targeted?
Nicko
DATE : Sun Feb 03 04:22:52 2008
On 2 Feb 2008, at 21:31, Scott Anguish wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Wesley Smith wrote:
>
>> On Feb 2, 2008 1:15 PM, Scott Anguish <<email_removed>> wrote:
>>> Do not post links to reverse engineered APIs here.
>>>
>> why not?
>
> First, the Mac OS X Software License Agreement says you may not
> disassembly or reverse-engineer (This is list not the place to
> debate whether or not this would fall under fair use or not)
Humph... OS X sends me an event on a post card (OK, in an NSEvent),
one it sends to everyone else who has a MacBook Air, and I'm not
allowed to tell people what it says? I agree that this isn't the
place to debate what is and isn't reverse engineering, but the simple
fact is that this isn't.
> Second, the discussion of private API is not appropriate to this
> list. That includes pointing to other resources. This has been the
> policy for a long time now.
That's news. They've been discussed on this list sporadically for a
long time, and this policy is news to me...
> Finally, if you have issues with these policies, the list is not the
> place to discuss or debate them. Contact the admin address in the
> signature.
This list is, however, the place to discuss APIs that are of use and
interest to Cocoa programmers, is it not? Can you suggest a single
other forum in which this information would be more useful or well
targeted?
Nicko
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| ? | Feb 2, 21:13 | |
| Scott Anguish | Feb 2, 22:15 | |
| Wesley Smith | Feb 2, 22:17 | |
| Scott Anguish | Feb 2, 22:31 | |
| Wesley Smith | Feb 2, 22:58 | |
| Nicko van Someren | Feb 3, 04:22 | |
| Hal Mueller | Feb 3, 09:16 | |
| ? | Feb 3, 10:43 | |
| Steve Christensen | Feb 3, 21:21 | |
| Jayson Adams | Feb 3, 21:42 | |
| Scott Anguish | Feb 3, 21:48 |






Cocoa mail archive

