FROM : Quincey Morris
DATE : Mon Feb 18 18:56:51 2008
On Feb 18, 2008, at 07:33, glenn andreas wrote:
> This, of course, is the key point, and based on the description from
> the OP, it probably isn't affine, since affine projections don't do
> perspective. So if you take a camera looking at a piece of graph
> paper that is slightly tilted, you're going to need something more
> powerful than an affine projection.
Yes, the OP needs to clarify. It sounded to me as if it was something
like matching an aerial photo in the camera to a map onscreen, based
on the word "calibration". But I was just guessing.
DATE : Mon Feb 18 18:56:51 2008
On Feb 18, 2008, at 07:33, glenn andreas wrote:
> This, of course, is the key point, and based on the description from
> the OP, it probably isn't affine, since affine projections don't do
> perspective. So if you take a camera looking at a piece of graph
> paper that is slightly tilted, you're going to need something more
> powerful than an affine projection.
Yes, the OP needs to clarify. It sounded to me as if it was something
like matching an aerial photo in the camera to a map onscreen, based
on the word "calibration". But I was just guessing.
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Bridger Maxwell | Feb 18, 05:47 | |
| Quincey Morris | Feb 18, 07:54 | |
| glenn andreas | Feb 18, 16:33 | |
| Quincey Morris | Feb 18, 18:56 |






Cocoa mail archive

