Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: @property problem
FROM : Jim Correia
DATE : Sun Feb 17 19:04:31 2008

On Feb 17, 2008, at 12:47 PM, William Squires wrote:

>> The 32-bit runtime must remain binary compatible with all code that 
>> was compiled and targeted for Tiger and earlier.
>>
>> It is extremely desirable to be able to link against the 10.5 SDK 
>> and still deploy your application on Tiger (after taking 
>> appropriate measures.)

>
>  Huh? I thought the point of linking against a new SDK was to take 
> advantage of features in that SDK, not to maintain backwards 
> compatibility with the older OS features?


Suppose there is a new framework feature on Leopard that I want to 
take advantage of. I link against the 10.5 SDK and in my code d

if (some feature available) {
   ...
} else {
   ... some alternate code, or nothing at all ...
}

The resulting binary can, with care, still work on 10.4 and earlier.

Jim

Related mailsAuthorDate
ml@property problem Randall Meadows Feb 11, 22:14
mlRe: @property problem Melissa J. Turner Feb 11, 22:27
mlRe: @property problem Kyle Sluder Feb 11, 22:28
mlRe: @property problem Joshua Emmons Feb 11, 22:29
mlRe: @property problem Shawn Erickson Feb 11, 22:33
mlRe: @property problem j o a r Feb 11, 22:35
mlRe: @property problem Brian Christensen Feb 11, 22:38
mlRe: @property problem Randall Meadows Feb 11, 22:56
mlRe: @property problem Jens Alfke Feb 11, 23:11
mlRe: @property problem Kyle Sluder Feb 11, 23:32
mlRe: @property problem j o a r Feb 11, 23:53
mlRe: @property problem Adam P Jenkins Feb 12, 00:33
mlRe: @property problem Bill Bumgarner Feb 12, 00:46
mlRe: @property problem Wade Tregaskis Feb 12, 00:46
mlRe: @property problem Kyle Sluder Feb 12, 01:08
mlRe: @property problem Nick Zitzmann Feb 12, 01:58
mlRe: @property problem Jens Alfke Feb 12, 04:44
mlRe: @property problem Andrew Farmer Feb 12, 06:25
mlRe: @property problem Sean McBride Feb 12, 16:58
mlRe: @property problem j o a r Feb 12, 19:48
mlRe: @property problem Jens Alfke Feb 12, 20:14
mlRe: @property problem Wade Tregaskis Feb 12, 20:35
mlRe: @property problem William Squires Feb 16, 23:35
mlRe: @property problem Jean-Daniel Dupas Feb 17, 01:03
mlRe: @property problem William Squires Feb 17, 17:59
mlRe: @property problem glenn andreas Feb 17, 18:11
mlRe: @property problem Bill Bumgarner Feb 17, 18:11
mlRe: @property problem Jim Correia Feb 17, 18:13
mlRe: @property problem William Squires Feb 17, 18:47
mlRe: @property problem mmalc crawford Feb 17, 18:57
mlRe: @property problem Bill Bumgarner Feb 17, 19:03
mlRe: @property problem Jim Correia Feb 17, 19:04
mlRe: @property problem William Squires Feb 17, 19:52
mlRe: @property problem Jean-Daniel Dupas Feb 17, 20:18
mlRe: @property problem Sherm Pendley Feb 17, 21:03
mlRe: @property problem Bill Bumgarner Feb 17, 21:09
mlRe: @property problem Bill Bumgarner Feb 17, 21:17
mlRe: @property problem Jens Alfke Feb 18, 00:06