FROM : John Stiles
DATE : Tue Jan 15 01:23:07 2008
Typically if someone wants to obscure code, I've found that it's the
part of the code that is responsible for distinguishing the paying
users from the demo users. (e.g. shareware registrations, or product
registration keys, or checking the network to see if other copies of
the same app are active with the same license key).
In my experience, this portion of your code will in fact be analyzed
by someone, and it is in your best interest to make it obscure.
For other portions of your app, I tend to agree that no one cares.
Unless money is involved somehow :)
On Jan 14, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Timothy Reaves wrote:
> On Sun, January 13, 2008 16:18, John Stiles wrote:
>> Honestly, I can't say I fully agree---having full symbol
>> information for
>> every method/function in a program makes reverse-engineering much,
>> much
>> simpler.
>>
>
> NEWS FLASH: no one gives a damn about other peoples code
> (statistically
> speaking). I wonder at all these companies and developers who are so
> concerned someone might want to look at their code. Get over
> yourselves.
> Your code isn't that interesting, and isn't that good!
>
> As others have pointed out, if someone really, really wants to
> crack it,
> they will. Just look at the iPhone.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (<email_removed>)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/jstiles%
> 40blizzard.com
>
> This email sent to <email_removed>
DATE : Tue Jan 15 01:23:07 2008
Typically if someone wants to obscure code, I've found that it's the
part of the code that is responsible for distinguishing the paying
users from the demo users. (e.g. shareware registrations, or product
registration keys, or checking the network to see if other copies of
the same app are active with the same license key).
In my experience, this portion of your code will in fact be analyzed
by someone, and it is in your best interest to make it obscure.
For other portions of your app, I tend to agree that no one cares.
Unless money is involved somehow :)
On Jan 14, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Timothy Reaves wrote:
> On Sun, January 13, 2008 16:18, John Stiles wrote:
>> Honestly, I can't say I fully agree---having full symbol
>> information for
>> every method/function in a program makes reverse-engineering much,
>> much
>> simpler.
>>
>
> NEWS FLASH: no one gives a damn about other peoples code
> (statistically
> speaking). I wonder at all these companies and developers who are so
> concerned someone might want to look at their code. Get over
> yourselves.
> Your code isn't that interesting, and isn't that good!
>
> As others have pointed out, if someone really, really wants to
> crack it,
> they will. Just look at the iPhone.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (<email_removed>)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/jstiles%
> 40blizzard.com
>
> This email sent to <email_removed>
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Mitchell Hashimoto | Jan 13, 09:15 | |
| Kyle Sluder | Jan 13, 09:55 | |
| Philippe Casgrain | Jan 13, 16:19 | |
| Stefan | Jan 13, 16:57 | |
| Kyle Sluder | Jan 13, 20:23 | |
| John Stiles | Jan 13, 22:18 | |
| glenn andreas | Jan 13, 23:06 | |
| John Stiles | Jan 14, 05:28 | |
| Chris Hanson | Jan 14, 06:51 | |
| Timothy Reaves | Jan 15, 01:08 | |
| John Stiles | Jan 15, 01:23 | |
| Alastair Houghton | Jan 15, 18:13 |






Cocoa mail archive

