FROM : Ilan Volow
DATE : Tue Sep 11 16:19:28 2007
If I ignore the "Beware of Leopard" of signs for just a moment, can
we reasonably expect NSRegularExpression (or something equivalent) in
10.5?
-- Ilan
On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Deborah Goldsmith wrote:
> We definitely want this to happen, but it's a lot of work. This is
> the current roadblock:
>
> http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/ticket/4521
>
> Please note the number of weeks estimated for implementation.
>
> Sorry for the long wait...
>
> Deborah Goldsmith
> Internationalization, Unicode Liaison
> Apple Inc.
> <email_removed>
>
> On Sep 6, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Mark Munz wrote:
>
>> Come on. 64b support is different than flashy animations and you
>> know it.
>>
>> Apple has a habit of making every developer repeat the same basic
>> work
>> that should be part of the system. Even with ICU included, you still
>> have to jump through a number of hoops to use it with NSStrings. They
>> know it (based on a conversation I had in 2006 at WWDC).
>>
>> Rather than fix the problem once, they basically force each developer
>> to "fix" the problem. And this is a pattern that is decades old.
>>
>> On 9/6/07, Shawn Erickson <<email_removed>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2007, at 7:05 AM, Mark Munz wrote:
>>>
>>>> and Apple
>>>> apparently doesn't feel addressing this issue is more important
>>>> than
>>>> animating the views as they slide around the screen.
>>>
>>> Yeah also why did they waste time adding 64b support when the could
>>> have been adding something a developer could have picked up
>>> themselves if they really needed it.
>>>
>>> -Shawn
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark Munz
>> unmarked software
>> http://www.unmarked.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Cocoa-dev mailing list (<email_removed>)
>>
>> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
>> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>>
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/<email_removed>
>>
>> This email sent to <email_removed>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (<email_removed>)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/<email_removed>
>
> This email sent to <email_removed>
Ilan Volow
"Implicit code is inherently evil, and here's the reason why:"
DATE : Tue Sep 11 16:19:28 2007
If I ignore the "Beware of Leopard" of signs for just a moment, can
we reasonably expect NSRegularExpression (or something equivalent) in
10.5?
-- Ilan
On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Deborah Goldsmith wrote:
> We definitely want this to happen, but it's a lot of work. This is
> the current roadblock:
>
> http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/ticket/4521
>
> Please note the number of weeks estimated for implementation.
>
> Sorry for the long wait...
>
> Deborah Goldsmith
> Internationalization, Unicode Liaison
> Apple Inc.
> <email_removed>
>
> On Sep 6, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Mark Munz wrote:
>
>> Come on. 64b support is different than flashy animations and you
>> know it.
>>
>> Apple has a habit of making every developer repeat the same basic
>> work
>> that should be part of the system. Even with ICU included, you still
>> have to jump through a number of hoops to use it with NSStrings. They
>> know it (based on a conversation I had in 2006 at WWDC).
>>
>> Rather than fix the problem once, they basically force each developer
>> to "fix" the problem. And this is a pattern that is decades old.
>>
>> On 9/6/07, Shawn Erickson <<email_removed>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2007, at 7:05 AM, Mark Munz wrote:
>>>
>>>> and Apple
>>>> apparently doesn't feel addressing this issue is more important
>>>> than
>>>> animating the views as they slide around the screen.
>>>
>>> Yeah also why did they waste time adding 64b support when the could
>>> have been adding something a developer could have picked up
>>> themselves if they really needed it.
>>>
>>> -Shawn
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark Munz
>> unmarked software
>> http://www.unmarked.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Cocoa-dev mailing list (<email_removed>)
>>
>> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
>> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>>
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/<email_removed>
>>
>> This email sent to <email_removed>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (<email_removed>)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/<email_removed>
>
> This email sent to <email_removed>
Ilan Volow
"Implicit code is inherently evil, and here's the reason why:"






Cocoa mail archive

