FROM : Deborah Goldsmith
DATE : Tue Sep 11 04:09:03 2007
We definitely want this to happen, but it's a lot of work. This is
the current roadblock:
http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/ticket/4521
Please note the number of weeks estimated for implementation.
Sorry for the long wait...
Deborah Goldsmith
Internationalization, Unicode Liaison
Apple Inc.
<email_removed>
On Sep 6, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Mark Munz wrote:
> Come on. 64b support is different than flashy animations and you
> know it.
>
> Apple has a habit of making every developer repeat the same basic work
> that should be part of the system. Even with ICU included, you still
> have to jump through a number of hoops to use it with NSStrings. They
> know it (based on a conversation I had in 2006 at WWDC).
>
> Rather than fix the problem once, they basically force each developer
> to "fix" the problem. And this is a pattern that is decades old.
>
> On 9/6/07, Shawn Erickson <<email_removed>> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 6, 2007, at 7:05 AM, Mark Munz wrote:
>>
>>> and Apple
>>> apparently doesn't feel addressing this issue is more important than
>>> animating the views as they slide around the screen.
>>
>> Yeah also why did they waste time adding 64b support when the could
>> have been adding something a developer could have picked up
>> themselves if they really needed it.
>>
>> -Shawn
>>
>
>
> --
> Mark Munz
> unmarked software
> http://www.unmarked.com/
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (<email_removed>)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/<email_removed>
>
> This email sent to <email_removed>
DATE : Tue Sep 11 04:09:03 2007
We definitely want this to happen, but it's a lot of work. This is
the current roadblock:
http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/ticket/4521
Please note the number of weeks estimated for implementation.
Sorry for the long wait...
Deborah Goldsmith
Internationalization, Unicode Liaison
Apple Inc.
<email_removed>
On Sep 6, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Mark Munz wrote:
> Come on. 64b support is different than flashy animations and you
> know it.
>
> Apple has a habit of making every developer repeat the same basic work
> that should be part of the system. Even with ICU included, you still
> have to jump through a number of hoops to use it with NSStrings. They
> know it (based on a conversation I had in 2006 at WWDC).
>
> Rather than fix the problem once, they basically force each developer
> to "fix" the problem. And this is a pattern that is decades old.
>
> On 9/6/07, Shawn Erickson <<email_removed>> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 6, 2007, at 7:05 AM, Mark Munz wrote:
>>
>>> and Apple
>>> apparently doesn't feel addressing this issue is more important than
>>> animating the views as they slide around the screen.
>>
>> Yeah also why did they waste time adding 64b support when the could
>> have been adding something a developer could have picked up
>> themselves if they really needed it.
>>
>> -Shawn
>>
>
>
> --
> Mark Munz
> unmarked software
> http://www.unmarked.com/
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (<email_removed>)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/<email_removed>
>
> This email sent to <email_removed>






Cocoa mail archive

