FROM : Philippe Mougin
DATE : Thu Apr 26 23:33:41 2007
> There is also the footprint to consider, surely?
> A C-style array is likely to be much smaller than
> an NSArray of objects, particularly in the case of
> primitive data types such as floats vs NSNumber objects.
It depends how the NSArrays you deal with are implemented (remember
that NSArray is a class cluster -- in other words, a semi-abstract
class). For instance, in F-Script we make extensive usage of NSArrays
(in particular arrays of NSNumbers), but we do so using an
implementation that transparently make them as small and as fast as C-
style arrays, in most cases.
Philippe Mougin
DATE : Thu Apr 26 23:33:41 2007
> There is also the footprint to consider, surely?
> A C-style array is likely to be much smaller than
> an NSArray of objects, particularly in the case of
> primitive data types such as floats vs NSNumber objects.
It depends how the NSArrays you deal with are implemented (remember
that NSArray is a class cluster -- in other words, a semi-abstract
class). For instance, in F-Script we make extensive usage of NSArrays
(in particular arrays of NSNumbers), but we do so using an
implementation that transparently make them as small and as fast as C-
style arrays, in most cases.
Philippe Mougin
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Philippe Mougin | Apr 26, 23:33 | |
| John Stiles | Apr 26, 23:36 | |
| Philippe Mougin | Apr 26, 23:51 |






Cocoa mail archive

