FROM : Scott Stevenson
DATE : Tue Nov 06 07:55:39 2007
On Nov 2, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
> I know. But it seems to me that if class posing is deprecated than
> method swizzling might also be "deprecated", perhaps even more so?
Yes. Swizzling and all that hackery will not work in the future (64-
bit, in particular) because the runtime is apparently moving away from
making everything revolve around raw structs.
The idea is to resolve the fragile base class issue. Along with better
performance, better architecture, and so on.
- Scott
DATE : Tue Nov 06 07:55:39 2007
On Nov 2, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
> I know. But it seems to me that if class posing is deprecated than
> method swizzling might also be "deprecated", perhaps even more so?
Yes. Swizzling and all that hackery will not work in the future (64-
bit, in particular) because the runtime is apparently moving away from
making everything revolve around raw structs.
The idea is to resolve the fragile base class issue. Along with better
performance, better architecture, and so on.
- Scott
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Andreas Höschler | Nov 1, 11:15 | |
| Christiaan Hofman | Nov 1, 11:44 | |
| Scott Stevenson | Nov 2, 02:28 | |
| Christiaan Hofman | Nov 2, 10:59 | |
| Adam R. Maxwell | Nov 2, 16:51 | |
| Christiaan Hofman | Nov 2, 18:02 | |
| Adam R. Maxwell | Nov 2, 18:28 | |
| Scott Stevenson | Nov 6, 07:55 | |
| Bill Bumgarner | Nov 6, 08:42 | |
| Bill Bumgarner | Nov 6, 08:45 | |
| Scott Stevenson | Nov 6, 10:58 |






Cocoa mail archive

