FROM : Jonathan Grynspan
DATE : Sun Aug 13 17:11:59 2006
Huh. Really? This is strange, because it didn't rear its head until I
upgraded. Looking at the discussion there, it caught some other
people off guard.
I feel suitably dumb now. :(
-Jonathan Grynspan
On 13-Aug-06, at 3:01 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> This is not really a bug if "Relax IEEE restrictions", is really
> just a synom for -ffast-math. -ffast-math turns on -ffinite-math-only
> which says: "Assume no NaNs or infinities are generated".
>
> Unless this is x86 which has a known bug and "Relax IEEE restrictions"
> is a synom for -funsafe-math-optimizations. See
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19116
>
> -- Pinski
DATE : Sun Aug 13 17:11:59 2006
Huh. Really? This is strange, because it didn't rear its head until I
upgraded. Looking at the discussion there, it caught some other
people off guard.
I feel suitably dumb now. :(
-Jonathan Grynspan
On 13-Aug-06, at 3:01 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> This is not really a bug if "Relax IEEE restrictions", is really
> just a synom for -ffast-math. -ffast-math turns on -ffinite-math-only
> which says: "Assume no NaNs or infinities are generated".
>
> Unless this is x86 which has a known bug and "Relax IEEE restrictions"
> is a synom for -funsafe-math-optimizations. See
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19116
>
> -- Pinski
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Grynspan | Aug 13, 07:31 | |
| Jonathan Grynspan | Aug 13, 07:51 | |
| Jonathan Grynspan | Aug 13, 08:07 | |
| Andrew Pinski | Aug 13, 09:01 | |
| Jonathan Grynspan | Aug 13, 17:11 |






Cocoa mail archive

