Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future
FROM : Shawn Erickson
DATE : Sat Jul 08 01:48:55 2006

On 7/7/06, Thomas Davie <tom.<email_removed>> wrote:
> Hi,
>    I'm wondering if there's a more suitable place to ask about/
> contribute to the future of Objective-C.  I am particularly
> interested in giving the language a decent type system.  At the
> moment I feel that it's type system is far too week for the jobs that
> we are trying to do with it when writing Cocoa apps.  We very rarely
> need hardware access or in fact any low level access of any kind, and
> as such, I suspect that a much stronger type system could be used.
> The most basic extension of the type system I can think of is to
> allow something akin to generics, or ADTs to allow us to specify such
> things as what type of object an array contains.
>
> So questions here really are (a) is there a more appropriate place to
> post this,


Yeah try... <http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/objc-language>

> (b) opinions on Objective-C's type system.


Objective-C is weakly typed runtime on purpose... if an object
supports the message you are sending is generally all you are
concerned about.

>We very rarely need hardware access or in fact any low level access

of any kind, and as such, I suspect that a much stronger type system
could be used.

Not sure I understand the logical connection in the above sentence.

-Shawn

Related mailsAuthorDate
mlObjective-C and it's future Thomas Davie Jul 8, 01:33
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Finlay Dobbie Jul 8, 01:46
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Shawn Erickson Jul 8, 01:48
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Charlton Wilbur Jul 8, 01:55
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Thomas Davie Jul 8, 02:10
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Robert Walker Jul 8, 02:12
mlRe: Re: Objective-C and it's future Shawn Erickson Jul 8, 02:22
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Rob Ross Jul 8, 02:29
mlRe: Re: Objective-C and it's future Shawn Erickson Jul 8, 02:41
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Thomas Davie Jul 8, 02:42
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Erik Buck Jul 8, 02:50
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Kenny Leung Jul 8, 02:57
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Gregory Weston Jul 8, 03:00
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Damien Sorresso Jul 8, 03:00
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Damien Sorresso Jul 8, 03:00
mlRe: Re: Objective-C and it's future Shawn Erickson Jul 8, 03:07
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Thomas Davie Jul 8, 03:12
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Damien Sorresso Jul 8, 03:14
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Rob Ross Jul 8, 03:15
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Rob Ross Jul 8, 03:18
mlRe: Re: Objective-C and it's future Shawn Erickson Jul 8, 03:23
mlRe: Re: Objective-C and it's future Shawn Erickson Jul 8, 03:25
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Thomas Davie Jul 8, 03:28
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Thomas Davie Jul 8, 03:40
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Sherm Pendley Jul 8, 03:54
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Kenny Leung Jul 8, 03:56
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Shawn Erickson Jul 8, 04:22
ml[Moderator] Re: Objective-C and it's future cocoa-dev-admins Jul 8, 04:56
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Thomas Davie Jul 8, 13:10
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future listposter Jul 8, 17:02
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future cocoa-dev-admins Jul 8, 17:05
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future John C. Randolph Jul 8, 18:50
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Ryan Stevens Jul 8, 19:13
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Scott Thompson Jul 10, 16:21
mlRe: Objective-C and it's future Andrew Satori Jul 10, 16:43
ml[Modertator] Re: Objective-C and it's future cocoa-dev-admins Jul 10, 17:13