FROM : Sherm Pendley
DATE : Sun Jul 02 03:21:27 2006
On Jul 1, 2006, at 8:28 PM, Derrick Bass wrote:
> Also, I'm but confused by Sherm Pendley's mention of link and
> unlink. I think he's assuming it is correct but needs a tortured
> interpretation in order to reconcile it with our notion of what
> should happen. Anyway, he's right that no copies are made.
That was essentially my assumption, yes - I'd assumed that the docs
were in some way correct, but written very badly, in a way that's
easy to misinterpret. It hadn't occurred to me that they might be
flat-out wrong - and I apologize to John Stiles for doubting him when
he pointed out that they are.
> But also, no hard links are made, either. As someone else pointed
> out, it is actually possible on HFS+ to detect whether or not a
> file has ever had multiple links. Once it is multiply linked, it
> acts forever differently, even if all but one of those links is
> subsequently deleted.
That's good to know - thanks.
> The documentation is simply incorrect.
Thanks for clearing that up.
sherm--
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
Hire me! My resume: http://www.dot-app.org
DATE : Sun Jul 02 03:21:27 2006
On Jul 1, 2006, at 8:28 PM, Derrick Bass wrote:
> Also, I'm but confused by Sherm Pendley's mention of link and
> unlink. I think he's assuming it is correct but needs a tortured
> interpretation in order to reconcile it with our notion of what
> should happen. Anyway, he's right that no copies are made.
That was essentially my assumption, yes - I'd assumed that the docs
were in some way correct, but written very badly, in a way that's
easy to misinterpret. It hadn't occurred to me that they might be
flat-out wrong - and I apologize to John Stiles for doubting him when
he pointed out that they are.
> But also, no hard links are made, either. As someone else pointed
> out, it is actually possible on HFS+ to detect whether or not a
> file has ever had multiple links. Once it is multiply linked, it
> acts forever differently, even if all but one of those links is
> subsequently deleted.
That's good to know - thanks.
> The documentation is simply incorrect.
Thanks for clearing that up.
sherm--
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
Hire me! My resume: http://www.dot-app.org






Cocoa mail archive

