Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: Virtual concept in Objective-C
FROM : Chris Stewart
DATE : Wed Jul 19 23:04:38 2006

Great thread.

I tend to agree with what Michael posted.  I would declare everything in the
header file and not really worry about methods being overridden if I'm
extending from a base class.


On 7/19/06, Dirk Stegemann <Dirk.Stegemann.<email_removed>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Am 19.07.2006 um 21:47 schrieb Michael Watson:
>
> > I'm not a big fan of putting the standard methods in the header
> > file, either.
>
> I usually put all those declarations of my class into the header file
> which aren't already declared in the super class, and which are used
> by code outside my class, so the compiler doesn't issue the "might
> not respond to..." warning; this gives me the chance to find those
> implementations which are indeed missing.
>
> Best regards,
> Dirk Stegemann
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Cocoa-dev mailing list      (<email_removed>)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/<email_removed>
>
> This email sent to <email_removed>
>




--
Chris Stewart
<email_removed>

Related mailsAuthorDate
mlVirtual concept in Objective-C Vinay Prabhu Jul 19, 08:32
mlRe: Virtual concept in Objective-C Shawn Erickson Jul 19, 08:40
mlRe: Virtual concept in Objective-C Dix Lorenz Jul 19, 08:43
mlRe: Virtual concept in Objective-C Finlay Dobbie Jul 19, 13:50
mlRe: Virtual concept in Objective-C Dix Lorenz Jul 19, 14:02
mlRE: Virtual concept in Objective-C Vinay Prabhu Jul 19, 14:04
mlRe: Virtual concept in Objective-C Scott Ribe Jul 19, 20:34
mlRe: Virtual concept in Objective-C Michael Watson Jul 19, 20:47
mlRe: Virtual concept in Objective-C Dirk Stegemann Jul 19, 21:39
mlRe: Virtual concept in Objective-C Chris Stewart Jul 19, 23:04