FROM : Martin
DATE : Sat Jul 15 02:53:13 2006
>Wait a minute --- I thought Micro$oft owns the RTF 'standard'.
>Has this situation changed? If Micro$oft indeed owns the
>RTF 'standard', how can they be producing non-'standard'
>RTF ?
They do own and produce the RTF standard. However, what the RTF standard says one should output and what MSWord actually outputs can be different. The documentation for the RTF standard also leaves something to be desired in terms of clarity and completeness.
~Martin
DATE : Sat Jul 15 02:53:13 2006
>Wait a minute --- I thought Micro$oft owns the RTF 'standard'.
>Has this situation changed? If Micro$oft indeed owns the
>RTF 'standard', how can they be producing non-'standard'
>RTF ?
They do own and produce the RTF standard. However, what the RTF standard says one should output and what MSWord actually outputs can be different. The documentation for the RTF standard also leaves something to be desired in terms of clarity and completeness.
~Martin
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Fredrik Olsson | Jul 14, 15:09 | |
| Julio Cesar Silva… | Jul 14, 15:28 | |
| Kenny Millar | Jul 14, 15:29 | |
| Fredrik Olsson | Jul 14, 15:36 | |
| Henry McGilton | Jul 14, 16:44 | |
| Julio Cesar Silva… | Jul 14, 17:44 | |
| Martin | Jul 15, 02:53 |






Cocoa mail archive

