FROM : Julian
DATE : Mon May 02 17:37:59 2005
I use gcc 4.0 in xcode to build our app and it runs fine on 10.3.0
7B85. So that statement in the xcode help is not entirely true.
~J
On May 2, 2005, at 11:07 AM, Nick Zitzmann wrote:
>
> On May 2, 2005, at 8:51 AM, Sean McBride wrote:
>
>
>> Oh yeah?... Why should this be? I could understand for C++ that
>> there
>> could be ABI changes, but for C/Obj-C?
>>
>
> As explained earlier, GCC 4 links the compiled code to a library
> titled "libmx", which did not exist in any version of Mac OS X
> prior to 10.3.9 (I think). GCC 3.3 doesn't do this.
>
> Nick Zitzmann
> <http://www.chronosnet.com/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (<email_removed>)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/<email_removed>
>
> This email sent to <email_removed>
>
DATE : Mon May 02 17:37:59 2005
I use gcc 4.0 in xcode to build our app and it runs fine on 10.3.0
7B85. So that statement in the xcode help is not entirely true.
~J
On May 2, 2005, at 11:07 AM, Nick Zitzmann wrote:
>
> On May 2, 2005, at 8:51 AM, Sean McBride wrote:
>
>
>> Oh yeah?... Why should this be? I could understand for C++ that
>> there
>> could be ABI changes, but for C/Obj-C?
>>
>
> As explained earlier, GCC 4 links the compiled code to a library
> titled "libmx", which did not exist in any version of Mac OS X
> prior to 10.3.9 (I think). GCC 3.3 doesn't do this.
>
> Nick Zitzmann
> <http://www.chronosnet.com/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (<email_removed>)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/<email_removed>
>
> This email sent to <email_removed>
>






Cocoa mail archive

