Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ?
FROM : Nicko van Someren
DATE : Fri Apr 29 13:41:58 2005

On 28 Apr 2005, at 17:52, Kevin Ballard wrote:

> I'm not aware of Xcode 2.0 being officially released separately from
> Tiger, but that seems to be what you're implying. That doesn't make
> sense anyway, because I've be quite surprised if Xcode 2.0 didn't
> require Tiger to run.


That's not at all what I was saying; Xcode 2 ships on the same DVD-ROM
as Tiger, which Apple have already shipped.

> By "out there" do you mean the accidental week-early release of Tiger
> by PCMall and ClubMac? If that's so, then the NDA still applies,
> because it says it ends once material is made available to the public
> *by apple*, which isn't what happened in this case.


Actually, that's not the way these clauses work about as you say...

> Anyway, this is a reasonably pointless argument.


Indeed, since you can now walk into the Apple Store in Tokyo and buy a
copy of Tiger (and a dual 2.7GHz G5 :-) see http://www.apple.co.jp/

   Nicko

Related mailsAuthorDate
mlid type field of an attribute ? Robert Miller Apr 27, 20:09
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Kevin Ballard Apr 27, 20:31
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Sean McBride Apr 27, 21:25
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Nicko van Someren Apr 28, 00:09
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Kevin Ballard Apr 28, 00:19
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Shawn Erickson Apr 28, 01:10
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Nicko van Someren Apr 28, 10:13
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Kevin Ballard Apr 28, 18:52
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Ricky Sharp Apr 28, 19:17
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Nicko van Someren Apr 29, 13:41
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Scott Stevenson Apr 29, 19:33