Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ?
FROM : Ricky Sharp
DATE : Thu Apr 28 19:17:29 2005

On Thursday, April 28, 2005, at 11:53AM, Kevin Ballard <<email_removed>> wrote:

>I'm not aware of Xcode 2.0 being officially released separately from 
>Tiger, but that seems to be what you're implying. That doesn't make 
>sense anyway, because I've be quite surprised if Xcode 2.0 didn't 
>require Tiger to run.


An Apple engineer confirmed this today on the Xcode mailing list; Xcode 2.0 will not run on systems prior to 10.4

>By "out there" do you mean the accidental week-early release of Tiger 
>by PCMall and ClubMac? If that's so, then the NDA still applies, 
>because it says it ends once material is made available to the public 
>*by apple*, which isn't what happened in this case.
>
>Anyway, this is a reasonably pointless argument.


Exactly.  By the time we all stop talking/arguing about it, it will be Friday evening anyhow :)

--
Rick Sharp
Instant Interactive(tm)

Related mailsAuthorDate
mlid type field of an attribute ? Robert Miller Apr 27, 20:09
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Kevin Ballard Apr 27, 20:31
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Sean McBride Apr 27, 21:25
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Nicko van Someren Apr 28, 00:09
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Kevin Ballard Apr 28, 00:19
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Shawn Erickson Apr 28, 01:10
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Nicko van Someren Apr 28, 10:13
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Kevin Ballard Apr 28, 18:52
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Ricky Sharp Apr 28, 19:17
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Nicko van Someren Apr 29, 13:41
mlRe: id type field of an attribute ? Scott Stevenson Apr 29, 19:33