FROM : Ondra Cada
DATE : Sun Apr 24 11:50:41 2005
Marcel,
On 24.4.2005, at 10:41, Marcel Weiher wrote:
> You seem to think that refactoring is somehow type-dependent
...
> Refactoring has nothing to do with type. If you rename the method
> 'whatever', you just change all senders.
The example the others pushed as the advantage over a regexp was
"renaming a method aaa of class A, leaving a method aaa of class B
intact". That has ***all*** to do with type.
Presumed we skip this, there is preciously little added value in smart
refactoring as compared with a good regexp search&replace. Which Xcode
has.
---
Ondra Čada
OCSoftware: <email_removed> http://www.ocs.cz
private <email_removed> http://www.ocs.cz/oc
DATE : Sun Apr 24 11:50:41 2005
Marcel,
On 24.4.2005, at 10:41, Marcel Weiher wrote:
> You seem to think that refactoring is somehow type-dependent
...
> Refactoring has nothing to do with type. If you rename the method
> 'whatever', you just change all senders.
The example the others pushed as the advantage over a regexp was
"renaming a method aaa of class A, leaving a method aaa of class B
intact". That has ***all*** to do with type.
Presumed we skip this, there is preciously little added value in smart
refactoring as compared with a good regexp search&replace. Which Xcode
has.
---
Ondra Čada
OCSoftware: <email_removed> http://www.ocs.cz
private <email_removed> http://www.ocs.cz/oc






Cocoa mail archive

