Cocoa mail archive
Re: Java vs. Objective-C for Cocoa
FROM : Zacharias J. Beckman
DATE : Sat Apr 23 19:29:16 2005
Is that the general assessment as far as XCode2 (with Tiger) goes, as
well? (It appears that CodeWarrior is "temporarily unavailable" from
Metroworks...)
--
Zacharias J. Beckman – <email_removed> – 805-482-2878 (office)
Director, Research and Development – LegalEdge Software
Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even
though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits
who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in the gray
twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat. – Theodore Roosevelt
On Apr 22, 2005, at 9:46 PM, John Stiles wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2005, at 7:44 PM, Rick Kitts wrote:
>
>> ObjC the language is fine. Cocoa the framework is incredible. Xcode
>> is pretty bronze age but serviceable.
>
> Hahahaha, couldn't have said it better myself :)
> Give CodeWarrior a shot. Other than the lame mid-90s style Carbon
> front-end, and MSL which you should just avoid, it is rockin'.
>
DATE : Sat Apr 23 19:29:16 2005
Is that the general assessment as far as XCode2 (with Tiger) goes, as
well? (It appears that CodeWarrior is "temporarily unavailable" from
Metroworks...)
--
Zacharias J. Beckman – <email_removed> – 805-482-2878 (office)
Director, Research and Development – LegalEdge Software
Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even
though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits
who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in the gray
twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat. – Theodore Roosevelt
On Apr 22, 2005, at 9:46 PM, John Stiles wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2005, at 7:44 PM, Rick Kitts wrote:
>
>> ObjC the language is fine. Cocoa the framework is incredible. Xcode
>> is pretty bronze age but serviceable.
>
> Hahahaha, couldn't have said it better myself :)
> Give CodeWarrior a shot. Other than the lame mid-90s style Carbon
> front-end, and MSL which you should just avoid, it is rockin'.
>
