Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: upper limit on retain count
FROM : Bob Ippolito
DATE : Sat Apr 23 00:40:05 2005

On Apr 22, 2005, at 6:25 PM, Scott Ribe wrote:

>> Well, I fear in that case you *cannot* use ObjC objects for them. 1e9
>> plus objects means (considerably more than) 7 GB of address space.
>> Although that is not in principle problem with a G5, currently it *is*
>> an unsolvable problem with the ObjC runtime

>
> Yes, sounds like an application that would need to use Tiger, with
> Cocoa for
> the user interface only, and a 64-bit backend process, and C++ &
> STL/Loki/Boost.


Sounds more like an application that should just make intelligent use
of mmap and/or subprocesses (which also makes scaling horizontally to
multiple machines possible).. unless, of course, the software
requirements are 16gb of ram and a coffee break before loading or
saving a file :)

-bob

Related mailsAuthorDate
mlupper limit on retain count Ivan S. Kourtev Apr 18, 22:43
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Daniel Jalkut Apr 19, 07:05
mlRe: upper limit on retain count John Stiles Apr 19, 17:45
mlRe: upper limit on retain count j o a r Apr 19, 18:19
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Axel Andersson Apr 19, 18:44
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Ali Ozer Apr 19, 18:46
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Ondra Cada Apr 19, 18:57
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Ivan S. Kourtev Apr 19, 20:30
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Ondra Cada Apr 19, 20:55
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Shaun Wexler Apr 19, 21:05
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Shaun Wexler Apr 19, 21:09
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Scott Ribe Apr 23, 00:25
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Bob Ippolito Apr 23, 00:40
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Scott Ribe Apr 23, 00:51
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Bob Ippolito Apr 23, 06:57
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Johnny Deadman Apr 23, 18:44