Re: Feature suggestions for easier debugging of Cocoa Bindings.

FROM : Scott Anguish
DATE : Wed Apr 20 11:34:26 2005

On Apr 19, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Corey O'Connor wrote:

>> The Cocoa bindings reference is your friend.
>>

>    The reference reminds me of Straustrup.


    Wow, for some reason I feel like that could be taken as a 
complement.

> Full of useful bits and
> insight, with no time wasted on making a set of cohesive documents to
> explain bindings from every viewpoint. ;-) What I would like, however,
> is not documented as a feature in the current implementation. :-)
>
>


    For Corey (and everyone else) now* would be an __excellent__ 
time to submit any feedback or bugs as far as the conceptual cocoa 
bindings documentation is concerned.  I know there is a need for 
more--heck, bindings could easily be a full-time documentation effort 
between releases--but if you have specific issues or suggestions 
please file them.

    The reference has no conceptual material in it because, well, 
it's meant as a reference.  The Cocoa Bindings book has more, and 
more is needed.  There are places where the reference needs to be 
backed up by more conceptual and task oriented material (virtually 
any of the "* Content" categories of bindings).


(* and by now, I mean like before the end of the week! Seriously)


--
"William Cheeseman ... is said not to be a doofus in real life." - 
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times Online

Scott Anguish
<email_removed>