Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: upper limit on retain count
FROM : Shaun Wexler
DATE : Tue Apr 19 21:09:06 2005

On Apr 19, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Ivan S. Kourtev wrote:

> Actually, 1e9 is approximately the same as 2^30 so at 1ns per retain
> message it will take about 4-5 seconds to send 2^32 messages.  Even at
> a much lower retain-message frequency, it is not inconceivable that
> the 2^32 limit is exhausted within a reasonable time.


If you're lucky, a -retain will take 1 µS, 1000 ns.  You're off by a
grand.  ;)
--
Shaun Wexler
MacFOH
http://www.macfoh.com

Related mailsAuthorDate
mlupper limit on retain count Ivan S. Kourtev Apr 18, 22:43
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Daniel Jalkut Apr 19, 07:05
mlRe: upper limit on retain count John Stiles Apr 19, 17:45
mlRe: upper limit on retain count j o a r Apr 19, 18:19
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Axel Andersson Apr 19, 18:44
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Ali Ozer Apr 19, 18:46
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Ondra Cada Apr 19, 18:57
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Ivan S. Kourtev Apr 19, 20:30
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Ondra Cada Apr 19, 20:55
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Shaun Wexler Apr 19, 21:05
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Shaun Wexler Apr 19, 21:09
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Scott Ribe Apr 23, 00:25
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Bob Ippolito Apr 23, 00:40
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Scott Ribe Apr 23, 00:51
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Bob Ippolito Apr 23, 06:57
mlRe: upper limit on retain count Johnny Deadman Apr 23, 18:44