FROM : Shaun Wexler
DATE : Tue Apr 19 21:09:06 2005
On Apr 19, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Ivan S. Kourtev wrote:
> Actually, 1e9 is approximately the same as 2^30 so at 1ns per retain
> message it will take about 4-5 seconds to send 2^32 messages. Even at
> a much lower retain-message frequency, it is not inconceivable that
> the 2^32 limit is exhausted within a reasonable time.
If you're lucky, a -retain will take 1 µS, 1000 ns. You're off by a
grand. ;)
--
Shaun Wexler
MacFOH
http://www.macfoh.com
DATE : Tue Apr 19 21:09:06 2005
On Apr 19, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Ivan S. Kourtev wrote:
> Actually, 1e9 is approximately the same as 2^30 so at 1ns per retain
> message it will take about 4-5 seconds to send 2^32 messages. Even at
> a much lower retain-message frequency, it is not inconceivable that
> the 2^32 limit is exhausted within a reasonable time.
If you're lucky, a -retain will take 1 µS, 1000 ns. You're off by a
grand. ;)
--
Shaun Wexler
MacFOH
http://www.macfoh.com
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Ivan S. Kourtev | Apr 18, 22:43 | |
| Daniel Jalkut | Apr 19, 07:05 | |
| John Stiles | Apr 19, 17:45 | |
| j o a r | Apr 19, 18:19 | |
| Axel Andersson | Apr 19, 18:44 | |
| Ali Ozer | Apr 19, 18:46 | |
| Ondra Cada | Apr 19, 18:57 | |
| Ivan S. Kourtev | Apr 19, 20:30 | |
| Ondra Cada | Apr 19, 20:55 | |
| Shaun Wexler | Apr 19, 21:05 | |
| Shaun Wexler | Apr 19, 21:09 | |
| Scott Ribe | Apr 23, 00:25 | |
| Bob Ippolito | Apr 23, 00:40 | |
| Scott Ribe | Apr 23, 00:51 | |
| Bob Ippolito | Apr 23, 06:57 | |
| Johnny Deadman | Apr 23, 18:44 |






Cocoa mail archive

