FROM : R. Scott Thompson
DATE : Thu Apr 14 07:42:04 2005
On Apr 13, 2005, at 4:38 PM, Lemings, Eric B wrote:
> This is my personal view on the whole Cocoa vs. C++ debacle. I believe
> that Apple actually WANTS to remain in a niche market with its meager
> share rather than joining the mainstream. Now don't get me wrong. Mac
> OS X is simply THE best operating system on the market today IMHO.
> After all, it has a rock solid Unix core. Apple pioneered the user
> interface and STILL has the most intuitive UI. They have a killer
> development IDE with Xcode and they have a very well designed API in
> Cocoa. The fact that it is written in Objective-C is the only thing
> holding them back. If it were written in C++, there would be a huge
> migration of developers to the Mac platform. Why? The fact is that
> C++
> is simply a mainstream language and Objective-C is not. No one (except
> Mac developers of course) are interested in it because nobody else uses
> it.
If having a C++ interface capable of producing professional
applications is the only thing "holding them back" (a statement with a
world of assumptions in-of-itself), then we have nothing to worry
about. Developers can create C++ applications on the Mac through the
Carbon API.
Scott
DATE : Thu Apr 14 07:42:04 2005
On Apr 13, 2005, at 4:38 PM, Lemings, Eric B wrote:
> This is my personal view on the whole Cocoa vs. C++ debacle. I believe
> that Apple actually WANTS to remain in a niche market with its meager
> share rather than joining the mainstream. Now don't get me wrong. Mac
> OS X is simply THE best operating system on the market today IMHO.
> After all, it has a rock solid Unix core. Apple pioneered the user
> interface and STILL has the most intuitive UI. They have a killer
> development IDE with Xcode and they have a very well designed API in
> Cocoa. The fact that it is written in Objective-C is the only thing
> holding them back. If it were written in C++, there would be a huge
> migration of developers to the Mac platform. Why? The fact is that
> C++
> is simply a mainstream language and Objective-C is not. No one (except
> Mac developers of course) are interested in it because nobody else uses
> it.
If having a C++ interface capable of producing professional
applications is the only thing "holding them back" (a statement with a
world of assumptions in-of-itself), then we have nothing to worry
about. Developers can create C++ applications on the Mac through the
Carbon API.
Scott
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Lemings, Eric B | Apr 13, 23:38 | |
| Ondra Cada | Apr 14, 00:16 | |
| bbum | Apr 14, 06:38 | |
| R. Scott Thompson | Apr 14, 07:42 | |
| Gen Kiyooka | Apr 14, 09:46 | |
| Henry Maddocks | Apr 14, 11:00 | |
| Gen Kiyooka | Apr 14, 11:30 | |
| Mike Paquette | Apr 14, 17:41 |






Cocoa mail archive

