FROM : Frederick Cheung
DATE : Thu Sep 30 20:13:02 2004
On 30 Sep 2004, at 19:07, Eric Ocean wrote:
> Okay. Hmm. Thanks for the help. Is there a way to tell Ld not to
> resolve a symbol until runtime? Or perhaps that wouldn't work either.
> Is it just a convention that Ld won't reference the symbol, or is it
> an actual "Ld really can't find the symbol" situation? If it's the
> former, it makes sense that there would be a flag to override that
> behavior.
>
On 10.3 and higher you can pass -undefined dynamic_lookup to ld
Fred
DATE : Thu Sep 30 20:13:02 2004
On 30 Sep 2004, at 19:07, Eric Ocean wrote:
> Okay. Hmm. Thanks for the help. Is there a way to tell Ld not to
> resolve a symbol until runtime? Or perhaps that wouldn't work either.
> Is it just a convention that Ld won't reference the symbol, or is it
> an actual "Ld really can't find the symbol" situation? If it's the
> former, it makes sense that there would be a flag to override that
> behavior.
>
On 10.3 and higher you can pass -undefined dynamic_lookup to ld
Fred
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Eric Ocean | Sep 30, 06:51 | |
| Karin Kosina | Sep 30, 12:37 | |
| Greg Hurrell | Sep 30, 13:29 | |
| Eric Ocean | Sep 30, 18:13 | |
| Glenn Andreas | Sep 30, 18:28 | |
| Eric Ocean | Sep 30, 19:07 | |
| Frederick Cheung | Sep 30, 20:13 | |
| Ken Ferry | Sep 30, 22:08 | |
| Eric Ocean | Oct 1, 00:41 |






Cocoa mail archive

