FROM : Gwynne
DATE : Fri Nov 19 19:39:38 2004
On Nov 19, 2004, at 1:13 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote:
>> It's not always used that way. The timer has a variable interval. The
>> 5-year interval is used when the associated UI object has been
>> disabled so that I don't have to keep checking whether or not the
>> timer exists. It's a convenience.
> Consider using NSDate distantFuture for you date.
Originally, I was. I changed it on the off chance that NSTimer just
didn't like that as a timer interval. I might as well change it back, I
suppose.
> I have never seen or heard of an issue with long period timers. You
> may want to post a code sample that can reproduce the failure and file
> a bug with it.
I'll try to find a reproducible case.
-- Gwynne, key to the Code that runs us all
Email: <email_removed>
Web: http://musicimage.plasticchicken.com/
DATE : Fri Nov 19 19:39:38 2004
On Nov 19, 2004, at 1:13 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote:
>> It's not always used that way. The timer has a variable interval. The
>> 5-year interval is used when the associated UI object has been
>> disabled so that I don't have to keep checking whether or not the
>> timer exists. It's a convenience.
> Consider using NSDate distantFuture for you date.
Originally, I was. I changed it on the off chance that NSTimer just
didn't like that as a timer interval. I might as well change it back, I
suppose.
> I have never seen or heard of an issue with long period timers. You
> may want to post a code sample that can reproduce the failure and file
> a bug with it.
I'll try to find a reproducible case.
-- Gwynne, key to the Code that runs us all
Email: <email_removed>
Web: http://musicimage.plasticchicken.com/
| Related mails | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Gwynne | Nov 19, 18:19 | |
| Shawn Erickson | Nov 19, 18:39 | |
| Gwynne | Nov 19, 18:55 | |
| Shawn Erickson | Nov 19, 19:13 | |
| Gwynne | Nov 19, 19:39 | |
| John C. Randolph | Nov 20, 00:04 |






Cocoa mail archive

