FROM : Jonathan Hendry
DATE : Sat Nov 09 20:55:50 2002
On Friday, Nov 8, 2002, at 05:17 America/New_York, Bill Cheeseman wrote:
> I haven't tried this, but it occurs to me that you could try isolating
> your
> Address Book code in a separate framework, and have your application
> load it
> only if you're running under 10.2 or newer.
How about inside a bundle instead? (Yeah, I know, frameworks are
bundles.
"Framework" connotes a larger degree of hassle to me, perhaps wrongly.)
Check the version of the OS, then if AddressBook is supported, load
the bundle that uses AddressBook. If not, load nothing, or else
load an alternate bundle.
--
Jonathan W. Hendry NeXTSTEP/OpenStep/Cocoa
<email_removed> programmer in Connecticut
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | <email_removed>
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
DATE : Sat Nov 09 20:55:50 2002
On Friday, Nov 8, 2002, at 05:17 America/New_York, Bill Cheeseman wrote:
> I haven't tried this, but it occurs to me that you could try isolating
> your
> Address Book code in a separate framework, and have your application
> load it
> only if you're running under 10.2 or newer.
How about inside a bundle instead? (Yeah, I know, frameworks are
bundles.
"Framework" connotes a larger degree of hassle to me, perhaps wrongly.)
Check the version of the OS, then if AddressBook is supported, load
the bundle that uses AddressBook. If not, load nothing, or else
load an alternate bundle.
--
Jonathan W. Hendry NeXTSTEP/OpenStep/Cocoa
<email_removed> programmer in Connecticut
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | <email_removed>
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.






Cocoa mail archive

