Skip navigation.
 
mlNSString and NSCopying Protocol
FROM : Starman
DATE : Tue Nov 19 16:13:53 2002

Hi everyone !

I just saw that NSString doesn't conform to NSCopying Protocol.

Theorically, the documentation of the protocol says : "The exact
meaning of \"copy\" can vary from class to class, but a copy must be a
functionally independent object with values identical to the original
at the time the copy was made."

So, I understand that a copy of a NSString gives me a new instance of
the object. But in fact, I get the same object (same memory address),
with retainCount incremented by one.

you can find a small tool to check what I say at the following url :
http://ixqdev.online.fr/BetaPBX/testString.tgz

I think it could be something optimized, since you gain memory space
and computing time, but can we say that NSString conforms to NSCopying
Protocol ? It has not the behaviour a developer will expect....

Am I correct ?

Starman
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | <email_removed>
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

Related mailsAuthorDate
mlNSString and NSCopying Protocol Starman Nov 19, 16:13
mlRe: NSString and NSCopying Protocol Ondra Cada Nov 20, 05:19
mlRe: NSString and NSCopying Protocol Sherm Pendley Nov 20, 05:49
mlRe: NSString and NSCopying Protocol Glenn Howes Nov 20, 07:28
mlRE: NSString and NSCopying Protocol Jonathan E. Jackel Nov 20, 23:28
mlRe: NSString and NSCopying Protocol Finlay Dobbie Nov 23, 23:43