Skip navigation.
 
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
FROM : Nicholas Riley
DATE : Sun Nov 10 03:17:21 2002

On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 07:02:57AM -0800, Dan Wood wrote:
> Ah, but that's circular reasoning!  :-)  If I knew how to conditionally
> load a framework if you were in 10.2, then I could apply the same logic
> and only load the Address Book framework if I was in 10.2 or newer!


What I think was meant was that you'd isolate the code into a plugin
which linked with AddressBook.framework, and in your main application
code, check the OS version and only load the plugin if it's 10.2 or
later.

--
=Nicholas Riley <<email_removed>> | <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/njriley>
        Pablo Research Group, Department of Computer Science and
  Medical Scholars Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | <email_removed>
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

Related mailsAuthorDate
ml"weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Dan Wood Nov 7, 20:20
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Bill Cheeseman Nov 8, 11:17
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Dan Wood Nov 9, 16:02
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Ondra Cada Nov 9, 16:31
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Marco Scheurer Nov 9, 16:40
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Bill Cheeseman Nov 9, 19:35
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Bill Cheeseman Nov 9, 19:38
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Jonathan Hendry Nov 9, 20:55
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Nicholas Riley Nov 10, 03:17
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Rosyna Nov 10, 05:30
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Sam Griffith Nov 10, 06:56
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Rosyna Nov 10, 08:39
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Bill Cheeseman Nov 10, 11:10
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Finlay Dobbie Nov 10, 13:38
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Finlay Dobbie Nov 10, 16:30
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Piers Uso Walter Nov 10, 18:34
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Ondra Cada Nov 10, 20:21
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Ondra Cada Nov 10, 20:27
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Rosyna Nov 10, 20:47
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Sam Griffith Nov 10, 21:56
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Finlay Dobbie Nov 10, 22:12
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Ondra Cada Nov 10, 22:29
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Bill Cheeseman Nov 10, 23:45
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Ondra Cada Nov 11, 01:11
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Marco Scheurer Nov 11, 11:07
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Bill Cheeseman Nov 11, 12:23
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Ondra Cada Nov 11, 14:52
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Marco Scheurer Nov 11, 17:27
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Ondra Cada Nov 11, 18:11
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Bill Cheeseman Nov 11, 20:51
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Ondra Cada Nov 11, 22:14
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Bill Cheeseman Nov 12, 00:37
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Rosyna Nov 12, 01:40
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Rosyna Nov 12, 01:43
mlRe: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? Rosyna Nov 12, 01:45